← Back to Digest
What strategies can global leaders adopt to avoid conflict between superpowers in a multipolar era?

Is War Between China and the US Inevitable?

Introduction

In an increasingly multipolar world, geopolitical tensions between major powers like China and the United States have become a focal point of global discourse. The question of whether war between these two superpowers is inevitable draws from historical precedents, economic interdependencies, and strategic rivalries. This essay explores the arguments for and against the inevitability of conflict, examining key factors such as territorial disputes, technological competition, and diplomatic efforts. By analyzing these elements, we can better understand the pathways to peace or escalation in a multipolar landscape.

Historical Context

The relationship between China and the US has evolved dramatically over the decades. From the Cold War era, where the US supported Taiwan and opposed communist China, to the post-1970s normalization of relations, the two nations have oscillated between cooperation and confrontation.

Key historical events include:

  • The Korean War (1950-1953): Direct military involvement where US-led forces clashed with Chinese troops.
  • Nixon's Visit to China (1972): A pivotal moment that opened doors to diplomatic and economic ties.
  • The End of the Cold War: Shifted focus from ideological battles to economic competition.

These events highlight that while tensions have led to proxy conflicts, direct war has been avoided since the mid-20th century. History suggests that inevitability is not a given; human agency and diplomacy play crucial roles.

Current Tensions and Flashpoints

Today, several issues fuel the narrative of potential conflict. The South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and trade disputes represent critical flashpoints where miscalculations could escalate into war.

  • Taiwan: China views Taiwan as a breakaway province, while the US provides defensive support under the Taiwan Relations Act. Any move toward Taiwanese independence could provoke a Chinese response, potentially drawing in the US.
  • South China Sea: China's militarization of artificial islands challenges freedom of navigation, leading to US freedom-of-navigation operations that heighten risks of accidental clashes.
  • Technological and Economic Rivalry: The US-China trade war, restrictions on technology transfers (e.g., Huawei bans), and competition in AI and semiconductors underscore a broader struggle for global dominance.

These tensions are exacerbated by nationalist sentiments in both countries, with leaders like Xi Jinping and US presidents framing the rivalry in zero-sum terms.

Arguments for Inevitability

Some analysts, drawing from theories like Graham Allison's "Thucydides Trap," argue that war is likely when a rising power threatens a dominant one. In this view, China's ascent challenges US hegemony, making conflict probable.

Supporting points include:

  • Military Buildup: China's rapid modernization of its People's Liberation Army (PLA), including hypersonic missiles and aircraft carriers, signals preparation for potential confrontation.
  • Strategic Ambitions: Initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) expand Chinese influence, perceived by the US as encirclement strategies.
  • Domestic Pressures: Economic slowdowns or internal unrest could push leaders toward external conflicts to rally national support.

Historical parallels, such as the lead-up to World War I, suggest that alliances and arms races can make war feel unavoidable.

Arguments Against Inevitability

Conversely, many experts contend that war is not inevitable, emphasizing mutual deterrence, economic interdependence, and global institutions that promote stability.

Key counterarguments:

  • Nuclear Deterrence: Both nations possess nuclear arsenals, invoking the logic of mutually assured destruction (MAD), which has prevented direct superpower wars since 1945.
  • Economic Ties: The US and China are deeply intertwined economically, with trillions in trade and investment. A war would devastate global supply chains and economies, creating strong incentives for avoidance.
  • Diplomatic Channels: Ongoing dialogues, such as the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, and multilateral forums like the UN, provide avenues for de-escalation.

Moreover, lessons from the Cold War show that ideological rivals can coexist without direct conflict through proxy engagements and arms control agreements.

Factors Influencing the Future

The trajectory toward war or peace depends on several dynamic factors. Leadership decisions, technological advancements, and global events will shape outcomes.

  • Leadership and Policy Choices: Pragmatic leaders could prioritize cooperation on issues like climate change and pandemics, fostering trust.
  • Allied Dynamics: US alliances (e.g., with Japan, Australia via AUKUS) and China's partnerships (e.g., with Russia) could either deter aggression or entangle more actors.
  • Public Opinion and Media: How narratives are framed in media can either inflame or calm tensions.

In a multipolar world, the involvement of other powers like India, the EU, and Russia adds complexity, potentially diffusing bilateral rivalries through broader coalitions.

Pathways to Avoidance

To navigate these tensions without war, proactive measures are essential. Both nations and the international community can take steps to reduce risks.

Recommended approaches:

  • Confidence-Building Measures: Regular military-to-military communications to prevent misunderstandings.
  • Economic Decoupling Mitigation: Policies that encourage fair trade rather than protectionism.
  • International Agreements: Strengthening treaties on arms control, cyber norms, and space militarization.

By focusing on shared interests, such as global stability and prosperity, conflict can be averted.

Conclusion

War between China and the US is not inevitable; it is a choice influenced by human decisions, strategic calculations, and unforeseen events. While tensions are high, the costs of conflict—economic ruin, loss of life, and potential nuclear escalation—far outweigh any perceived benefits. In a multipolar world, fostering dialogue, interdependence, and mutual respect offers a viable path to peace. Ultimately, the future hinges on whether leaders choose competition over confrontation or collaboration over conflict.